Seven paradoxes of the socialist state: Nobody works, but the plan is always fulfilled. The plan is fulfilled, but the shelves in the stores are empty. The shelves are empty, but nobody starves. Nobody starves, but everybody is unhappy. Everybody is unhappy, but nobody complains. Nobody complains, but the jails are full.
Time: Socialist Construction
China
1949: Founding of the People’s Republic of China
1953: First Five Year Plan
1954: First Taiwan Strait Crisis
1957: Anti-Rightist Campaign
1958-1959: Great Leap Forward, followed by worst famine in human history
1966: Cultural Revolution
World
1950: Korean War
1954: French troops defeated at Dien Bien Phu
1955: Bandung Conference
1956: Nikita Khrushchev issues secret speech against Stalin.
1956: Hungarian Revolution
1960: Sino-Soviet split
Place: Northeast China Today
Key Questions
Marc Riboud: Engineer’s Office
Angang: How was China’s largest industrial state-owned enterprise run?
Planned economy: How did it work in practice?
Who was the working class in socialist China? How were they organized?
Manchuria: After the War
Despite wartime damages, Manchuria became a key target for both the Nationalists and the Communists during the Civil War.
Soviet de-industrialization: Autumn 1945
The Soviet military removed machines from Japanese industrial plants and sent to the Soviet Union.
Physical infrastructures remained largely intact.
Factories and mines in Anshan lost 60–100% of their annual production capacity.
Chinese Take-over: 1946-1949
1946: The Nationalists took over most of southern Manchuria’s industrial centers
1947: Former Japanese factories in Manchuria produced 49 percent of the industrial output.
Manchuria as Model
Manchuria was key in the CCP’s shift from decentralized guerrilla units to a centralized state.
Gao Gang
1946: The CCP created the Northeastern Administration Committee (NAC).
The NAC, led by the CCP regional head Gao Gang, served as a model for regional administration in the rest of China.
1947: The CCP created first economic plan for industry.
Manchuria became the CCP’s experimental site for Soviet-style economic planning policies.
Manchuria as Linchpin
Winning Manchuria was key to winning the rest of China.
Map of Three Major Campaigns
Three major campaigns:
Liaoshen Campaign (Sep 1948 – Nov 1948): Control of Manchuria
Huaihai Campaign (Nov 1948 - Jan 1949): The north of Yangtze River
Pingjin Campaign (Nov 1948 - Jan 1949): End of GMD dominance in North China; take-over of Beijing and Tianjin
1949-10-01: Founding of the PRC
Manchuria: “Oldest Son” of the People’s Republic
Manchuria was the largest center of heavy industry in the PRC in the early 1950s – a status built on Japanese, Nationalist, and Soviet legacies.
In the first half of 1951, Manchuria produced 57.2% of China’s heavy industry output.
In 1952, Manchuria produced 40.6 percent of China’s electricity, 33.2 percent of coal, 39.4 percent of cement, 69.9 percent of steel, and 55.1 percent of petroleum.
40% of industrial investment during the First Five-Year Plan occurred in Manchuria.
Manchuria: China’s Most Industrialized Region
Greater administrative areas of the PRC, 1950.
Regional allocation of industrial investment, 1953–57 (in millions ¥)
Controlling the urban population
Marc Riboud: Antique window shop in Liulichang, Beijing, 1965
Pillars of control:
Neighborhood organization
Household registration
Work unit
Personal dossiers
Neighborhood organization
Organization
Unit
Salaried?
Population
Municipal gov
City
Y
Several hundred thousand
District gov
District
Y
Street Committees
Subdistrict
Y
~8 neighborhoods
Residents’ Committees
Neighborhoods
N
Several hundred households
Residents’ Small Groups
Block, building, lane, etc.
N
15-40 households
Household registration
Marc Riboud: Man with child, 1965
1955: Permanent system of population registration established
Linchpin for administering urban China, with identity and services – food, employment, health care – tied
Differentiated citizenship: Urban vs. Rural divide institutionalized
Work unit system
Marc Riboud: Canteen of a factory in Anshan, 1957
From cradle to death: Housing, goods, services formerly provided by private establishments
Locus of personal identity: Self-contained communities with near permanent employment
Organs of political and social control: Organization of political study, Approval of marriage diverse, Travel authorization, etc.
Discuss: Anshan Steelworks
Marc Riboud: Female worker at Anshan 1957
Who runs Anshan? Specifically, what are dual lines of control?
What issues did the factory face? What were the main causes?
From Farm to Factory
Marc Riboud: Anshan in 1957
State ownership of all productive assets and financial sector
Collective farms: Sell food quotas to the state at low prices
Extracting surpluses out of the countryside to promote urban industry
Pillars of the planned economy
Marc Riboud: Dock workers
Market demand and financial markets no longer drivers of the economy
Economic activity driven by “production demand”
“Unproductive demand” – e.g. consumer goods – suppressed
Key goal: capital formation at accelerated pace
Role Play: Dartmouth Glass Works
Assignment:
You are the management team of a glass factory in Manchuria in the 1950s.
The government provides resources and a production quota for sheet glass.
You can produce glass in various thicknesses and weights.
Thicker glass is easier to produce but weighs more; Thinner glass is harder to produce but weighs less.
To fulfill the quota of 6 million, you have three production options based on quantity (sheets of glass) and weight: 250,000 (12 lbs), 500,000 (6 lbs), or 1,000,000 (3 lbs).
Questions:
How much will you execute the plan? Choose one of the three options.
How much will you actually produce? Why?
What are your main goals in production?
How will you work with other stakeholders – banks, horizontal and vertical authority, workers, etc.?
Soft budget constraint: System designed to maximize productive investments leads to wasteful use of resources; inefficient projects keep on getting subsidies and operating due to government assistance.
SOEs and local governments disregard cost-benefit analysis, accumulate debt, and exploit national resources
Consumer austerity: rationing
Reagan tells Soviet Jokes
Discuss: Communist Neo-Traditionalism
Explain the following attributes that, according to Walder, describe the organization of Mao-era Chinese enterprises:
“neo-traditional” (251)
“particularistic”, with both “formal and informal” dimensions (251)
What explains the stability and legitimacy of Communist states? Explain the three structural sources of consent:
Clientelist nature of party-activist relations
Personal ties
Practice and ideology of paternalism
Consider Walder’s theory in the context of Angang: How does it reflect reality on the ground?
Walder: Three Structural Sources of Consent
Clientelist party–activist relations
A minority of activist workers are tied closely to party managers through patron–client networks.
Activists get career benefits, status, and material favors in exchange for loyalty and mobilizing others.
These ties produce support among key workers and create divisions within the workforce that block collective resistance.
Diffuse web of individual connections
Most workers rely on informal, personal channels to bend rules, get extra rations, or win favors.
Individuals pursue strategies to “beat the system”, rather than collective political action.
Superficial compliance: people accept the system because they can obtain personal exceptions, not because they endorse ideology.
Practice and ideology of paternalism
Enterprises act as paternal providers: secure jobs, generous benefits, and direct distribution of scarce goods (food, housing materials, coupons).
These gestures build gratitude and acceptance of party/enterprise authority as legitimate.
Rethinking the Chinese Workplace
Walder
Comparative sociological argument about industrial authority
Theoretical explanation of political legitimacy and social stability — clientelist party–activist ties, diffuse personal networks, and enterprise paternalism as structural sources of consent
Hirata
Detailed historical/organizational case study of a major SOE (Angang)
Institutional mechanics of bargaining, dual control, and organizational conflicts
Uneasy alliance
Stalin and Mao poster
Stalin on socialist China: “After victory, the Chinese government will be a national revolutionary and democratic government rather than a communist one”
Mao on the Soviet Union: “Big power chauvinism”, and fear of revisionism and capitalist restoration
Tension between Soviet model of hierarchical control and CCP base area practices
What Soviet lessons?
The Soviet model offered not a singular template, but conflicting lessons to the CCP:
New Economic Policy
Lenin’s pragmatic and moderate program (1921–1927)
Retreat from full communism, allowing for some private enterprise and market mechanisms after the Russian Civil War.
High Stalinist models
Forced collectivization, industrialization and urbanization (1929–1934)
Bureaucratic Stalinism
Central planning and management of the economy and the state
From Moderation to Radicalism
Mid-1956 to mid-1957
Time of consolidation and adjustment to a new economic system.
Mao Zedong’s “Ten Major Relationships” speech showed a more practical approach to political and economic issues.
After Khrushchev’s secret speech criticizing Stalin in Feb 1956, Mao launched the “Hundred Flowers” movement to encourage diverse opinions.
After 1957
By mid-1957, the Hundred Flowers movement ended following widespread criticism.
After purges against party critics, economic authority was given to cadres eager to follow Mao’s directives and prove they were not “rightist.”
Mao aimed for China to surpass the UK in fifteen years, inspired by Khrushchev’s goal to surpass the US.
Great Leap Forward: Agriculture
Rural cadres faced pressure to achieve significant results in both crop production and rural construction.
Building communes
The rural people’s commune originated in Henan province; Mao Zedong praised the experimental Qiliying Rural People’s Commune in August 1958.
The focus of commune and national leadership was on increasing grain and cotton production, with grain as the “key link” in agriculture.
A competitive process to form communes ensued: 700,000 co-operatives consolidated into 26,000 communes, each averaging 4,000-5,000 families.
Rural construction campaign
In the winter of 1958-1959, hundreds of millions of farmers moved dirt and rock to build dams, irrigation, and smooth crop land.
This construction work interfered with farming and crop production.
Great Leap Forward: Industry
In 1958, most enterprises were transferred from central control to local governments.
Mao initiated a campaign to boost iron and steel production using small, local furnaces.
This expansion lacked coordination, leading to unusable products and missing inputs. The chaos was also exacerbated by unreliable statistics.
Back from the brink
How can China restore production and end famine?
Inflated numbers: Grain harvest in 1958
Official figure: 375 million tons
Actual figure: 200 million tons, 2.5% increase from previous year
By April 1958: Widespread food shortages and riots
By early 1959: Famine spreading nation-wide
1960: Soviet Union withdrew 1,400 specialists from China.
Restoring Agriculture
Grain importation
China began importing large amounts of grain in 1961 after previously exporting it.
While grain imports were mainly for urban residents, it allowed for reduced quotas for farmers.
Return of Individual Production
Management of crop production was passed down to the production team level within the commune system.
In some areas, private plots and free markets were restored, with production determined by individual families.
Restoring Industry
Devolution of planning
Planning and coordination occurred at provincial and lower levels until reforms in 1984; only critical sectors were managed nationally.
Urban industrial employment did not recover to pre-Great Leap levels despite a near doubling of urban employment between 1958 and 1960.
Reduction of urban population
The government reduced the urban population by forcing 14 million back to the countryside.
The hukou system, registering households as urban or rural, restricted urban residency and created a two-tier citizenship.
Urban employment growth in the 1960s and 1970s was driven by employing urban women, who increased from 13.5% of the workforce in 1957 to nearly half by 1979-1980.
A Leap into the Unknown: The Cultural Revolution
China created the Third Five-Year Plan (1966-1970) in 1965, maintaining decentralized industry management regulations.
The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution, starting in 1966, caused the collapse of planning agencies.